Total Holdings USA, Inc. v. Curran Composites, Inc., C.A. No. 4494-VCS, Strine, V.C. (Del. Ch. Oct. 9, 2009)
The Court denied defendant Curran Composites’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, and held that Section 15-114 of Delaware’s Revised Uniform Partnership Act provided a basis for the court to exercise personal jurisdiction over Curran as a non-resident partner of a Delaware general partnership. The Court found, among other matters, that the general partnership agreement clearly chose Delaware law to govern, and the controversy involved a dispute over the meaning of the partnership agreement.