Document: Cornerstone Brands, Inc. v. O’Steen, C.A. No. 1501-N, Chandler, C. (Del. Sept. 20, 2006)
The Court denied a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as to claims based on an agreement which granted stock options to a former employee, because DGCL § 111 grants the Court of Chancery jurisdiction over agreements by which a corporation sells stock or creates rights respecting its stock.