Plaintiffs attempted to have the Court reverse a Stay Order in favor of arbitration determination based on false pretenses, claiming that it was impossible for them to fund arbitration and they were unaware of the size of the required arbitration filing fee. A voluminous factual record proved otherwise and the Court accordingly granted the Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice finding that when a party knowingly misleads the Court in order to secure an unfair tactical advantage, the Court must regard that party as “forfeit[ing] its right to equity’s aid”
